Value and Job Creation = World Change

Let me start off by saying that I love TechCrunch and I have a lot of respect for Mike Arrington. I agree with a lot of what he says and believes in, so this isn’t a personal attack on him. This is just inspired by a post he made on Twitter and that’s all.

Also, I’d like to point out that I donate to several charities, but I research them very well before donating and I also believe there are very few worth donating to and that’s what this post is all about.

You see, I hear this a lot – “If you really cared about the world, you’d give your money to charities instead of x, y or z.” The thing is, most charities are BULLSHIT. Giving money to most charities is like flushing money down a toilet. I have worked at three non-profits in my life: Greenpeace, Shanti Gallery (art gallery who’s proceeds helped AIDS research) and WEAP (organization that helped women in underprivileged or welfare to work situations learn technology skills to get better jobs). I phone canvassed for Greenpeace (age 16), sold art for Shanti (age 17) and was the CTO of WEAP (age 25), so I’ve had broad experience in different organizations over the years. What did all three of the non-profits I worked for have in common? Mismanagement of money and very little social change, research or animals saved. The only thing they all did well was make someone feel a sense of happiness that they did a good deed in the world when they wrote huge checks.

Also, businesses are in the business of succeeding and making money. Non-profits are not. They don’t have same methods of success. When non-profits start to run out of money, they don’t get crafty, they just ask for more. It is like a never ending bleeding wound that you just stuff bandages on. A for-profit business will create a return on investment or go down trying.

Now that I’m in a position to invest, the amount of charities that contact me begging for money is astounding. Every one of them promises the same thing – great change in the world and a promise for a better future.

You see, I believe the greatest good you can do in the world is create value (goods or services) that consumers and businesses want to pay for and in doing so, you create jobs. I think a better use of money than charities is investments in the stock market or businesses – your own or someone elses. In doing so, you have a better chance of improving the world.

What about the 6k I spent on TED? Well, every time I meet someone or share ideas, I have a better chance of creating value or jobs and so do they. Those connections are valuable for business, theirs and mine. It isn’t like we’ll chat or I’ll watch a talk and I’ll go home feeling good that I saved a whale or solved world hunger. The value of networking pays off over time and who you know makes you like Voltron. I’m only so strong by myself, but with the power of others and their ideas, you can truly start making change in the world together, especially if you incorporate those changes into business.

So, what charities do I donate to? Charities that operate like for-profit organizations such asĀ  Kiva and Reason Magazine/Foundation. I think the only exception I’ve made is for the Methuselah Foundation, because medical research is tricky and requires a lot of money and the payback sometimes may not even be seen in our lifetime, but if they succeed the payoff is great. I donate money to the WJF and it is a for-profit entity.

In the end, do what you want with your money and don’t listen to people who want you to feel guilty for spending your money on whatever the heck you want to, because even the act of buying a thing excels innovation and ideas. Buying a thing on Ebay might be more beneficial than any amount of money given to a non-profit at the end of the day.

Share:
  • TwitThis
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Ma.gnolia
  • Reddit
  • Technorati
  • Tumblr
  • email
  • Print
  • I see TechCrunch's point - $6000 is a LOT, and it ends up outpricing people in developing countries & low-income situations who could really benefit from the connections and knowledge at TED (not to mention the opportunity to PRESENT!). Even the "non-profit" price is rather steep. (My rant: http://is.gd/hk7G)

    You may be interested in social enterprises - for-profit businesses with a strong (if not main) focus on doing social good. Read "The End of Charity" for a great intro to them.
  • All of the TED talks are available to the public and as for speaking, I'm sure they'd welcome speakers from developing countries and maybe they already do.

    However, having me there paying my way with my own money and thinking about the world and what to do with my money seems like a positive thing.

    I agree, I'm much more intersted in social enterprises. I'll look into reading that for sure, thank you!
  • Peter Kevin Reeves
    For the most part, I agree with you.

    Every member of my immediate family (Mom, Dad and Brother) was in the military. As such, I try to donate to causes that help and respect those who've served their country.

    There are many, many charities for this cause, but I've been horribly disappointed by the vast sums of money most spend on fundraising, without much proof they help the veterans I want to support. The noted exception being the DAV (Disabled American Veterans) who do amazing work, and make good use of my donations.

    One out of dozens. It's incredibly frustrating.

    The sad byproduct is that people either feel vindicated by writing a check, or just stop caring. Neither solves the problem. It's almost like we need a Consumer Reports for Charities.

    I love the concept that jobs are a better investment. Indeed, I think in many cases they are. Like everything else in life, I suspect that the world needs both sides. Employment, as well as useful, well run charities.

    That said, $6,000 still strikes me as an awful lot for a conference. ;)
  • Aumie
    Don't you think you're making a lot of presumptions to claim that greenpeace creates very little social change based on your experience with them as a 16yo call center employee? I'm not implying that they have in fact created monumental social change, but it seems odd to make such a claim based on a very low level job within the org.

    Also: Hell yes to Kiva. I was actually offered a job with them recently as their IT Manager, but the pay was very low, and I couldn't justify the move from Portland. But still; they are awesome and kudos for donating to them.
  • @Aumie, first off, I wasn't your ordinary 16 year old. I did a lot of research after this and figured out exactly how much money goes into activism and how much is spent on general operations of the company (aka headcount, office space, goods). Guess what? Most of the money you give to Greenpeace goes into employing their employees, office space and paper (that shit they send you in the mail begging for more money). Prove me wrong, find examples of where Greenpeace has created more social change than Kiva with the hundreds of millions of dollars they have received over the years.

    Awesome! I absolutely love Kiva.
  • @pkreeves 6k is a lot of money, I agree, but I think if you have it to spend and you want to, it is all relative.
  • Aumie
    Yea. I'm not arguing with you at all. I think the Greenpeace of today is a questionable org, and I don't really think comparing them to Kiva is an apples to apples comparison.

    Honestly, I think a lot of the social impacts that Greenpeace has aren't within the realm of measurement being that IMO their big accomplishments usually revolve around keeping certain issues (whaling, for example) in the media. Despite that I may not always agree with what they do, I appreciate that they are able (even through controversy) to maintain a certain level of visibility within current dialog on social / environmental issues, and I think that's really one of their larger accomplishments.
  • Peter Kevin Reeves
    Very true.

    I got an email from someone on Zivity today, incredulous that I've voted 2,500 times, and wondering how it was possible.

    I told them the math was easy. That $150 a month over a year-and-a-half would easily buy 2,500 votes.

    I had it to spend, and I wanted to. Besides, I'm employing photographers and models! ;)
  • @pkreeves people don't believe that i actually buy my votes on zivity. i've never been comped a vote ever.

    you know you have reached some point of success when people start coming up with conspiracy theories.
  • Rosalyn Fay
    "Most charities are bullshit" is a ridiculous claim, esp. given that you've only worked in three, and unless your making site visits and doing extensive research on the thousands of charities out there, you should be more cautious about making such broad claims. This world would look a lot different if it weren't for churches and charities that do the work that governments are incapable of any business don't find profitable. Now, what is bullshit is the idea that business can solve all social ills.

    It's true that many charities are ineffective and their administrative budgets are bloated, but I can't help but think about the hundreds of CEO's who are buying corp. jets and getting massive bonuses right now while they lay off tens of thousands of workers. If anything, now is the time to increase one's donations to charities and churches who are going to be picking up the social bill while everyone's taxes are going to bail out those poor corporations whose pure greed has destroyed our economy.
  • Speaking of broad claims, have you studied economics at all?

    Pure greed. Now, that's funny.

    For the record, I don't support bailouts of any kind.
blog comments powered by Disqus